Explain the similarities and differences in your two solutions to the same dilemma.

Paper details:
Consider the ethical dilemma given below. Write an ethics paper about it, including all the following information and analysis:
1.Solve the dilemma using any two of the following Three Primary Schools of Ethics we discuss this week from our assigned reading. (Ends based, Rules based, or Care based).
2.Explain the similarities and differences in your two solutions to the same dilemma.
3.State (and justify) whether you feel the two schools of ethics are worthy of use in “real life” dilemmas.
4.Do you feel that Aristotle would have approved of either of your solutions? Why or why not?

Please note that your ethics papers this term will be a great practice for you in doing the Final Exam. Your final exam is an essay exam which will follow a very similar format to the homework assignments…so please be sure to spend some time doing your readings and applying them to your written assignments.

Your papers should be about two typed pages, double spaced. Use the DeVry standard format for the paper (the title page and citation pages do not count among the two pages). Please organize your thoughts, use headings, and create readable documents with grammar and spelling checked.

The Dilemma will be your choice from either of the two following:

Choice 1: Over the past few decades, a sizable industry has arisen to serve the demand for ready-made and even customized compositions and term papers. Many students presumably believe there is nothing morally wrong with the practice of buying one of these papers and turning it in to fulfill a course requirement. Review what you read about plagiarism in this chapter. Then write a several-paragraph explanation of its message for a friend who doesn’t get it. (Be sure to follow the approach explained in that section so you avoid committing plagiarism yourself).

Choice 2: A married couple, both addicted to drugs, are unable to care for their infant daughter. She is taken from them by court order and placed in a foster home. The years pass. She comes to regard her foster parents as her real parents. They love her as they would their own daughter. When the child is 9 years old, the natural parents, rehabilitated from drugs, begin court action to regain custody. The case is decided in their favor. The child is returned to them, against her will. Does ethics support the law in this case? Discuss.

the students at atlantic spring high school wanted to encourage people to buy tickets to the spring musical early. tickets at the door cost $6, and tickets purchased in advanced cost $4. receipts from ticket sales totaled $2,000 and there were 410 tickets sold. how many tickets were sold at the door

the students at atlantic spring high school wanted to encourage people to buy tickets to the spring musical early. tickets at the door cost $6, and tickets purchased in advanced cost $4. receipts from ticket sales totaled $2,000 and there were 410 tickets sold. how many tickets were sold at the door

The labor movement suffered a number of defeats from 1877 until the early 1930s, and important long-lasting victories starting in the late 1930s. Explain, with examples from history, what you think were the most important reasons for labor’s defeats and for its victories.

The labor movement suffered a number of defeats from 1877 until the early 1930s, and important long-lasting victories starting in the late 1930s. Explain, with examples from history, what you think were the most important reasons for labor’s defeats and for its victories. Be sure to reference Babson multiple times in your posts. Also draw upon the “Lessons of Labor History” file and tell us what you see as the most important lessons from labor’s past. You may want to critique different unions’ strengths and weaknesses (such as the IWW, Knights of Labor, AFL, and CIO) and how unions were organized (such as the degree of member involvement and democracy, responses to racism a

termine the author’s strategy or criteria for selecting works to be reviewed, how the presentation of the works is organized (for example, by time, by focus, or by methodology), the levels of analysis used in describing the research (individual, group, organization, or industry), and the author-identified limitations, implications, and recommendations.

Determine the author’s strategy or criteria for selecting works to be reviewed, how the presentation of the works is organized (for example, by time, by focus, or by methodology), the levels of analysis used in describing the research (individual, group, organization, or industry), and the author-identified limitations, implications, and recommendations. Write a brief summary of the article(s) discussing these elements.

2. Construct a Concept Map (see examples I will attach) that portrays some of the key articles reviewed by the author of the literature review you found, and explain the organizational strategy you used in constructing this. Include the concept map diagram and organizational strategy in your summary (including diagram), and conclude the write-up with a comment about what you learned from creating a concept map. Use apa citation with concept map also.

Submit your summary and concept map in the assignment area. Also, attach a copy of the literature review article you used for this assignment.

Here is the criteria required to get a good grade:
a.Determines critical strategies or criteria used by authors in scholarly works, and thoroughly understands the underlying relevance of these.
b.Identifies levels of analysis used in describing research and demonstrates the relevance of their use.
c.Articulates an understanding of limitations, implications, and recommendations as identified by authors of scholarly works. Understanding is articulated with exceptional clarity and is convincing at a superior level.
d.Communicates with superior effectiveness and closely follows APA formatting guidelines throughout.
———-
Added on 31.10.2015 16:45
Pleas use the The MEAL Plan (Main idea, Evidence, Analysis, and Link) when constructing the paragraphs. Identify the (M)(E)(A)(L) in the paragraph at the beginning of the sentence in that paragraph. In the MEAL order..

Given what you now know, what you have read, and what we have discussed about the history of European imperialism in the 16th-19th centuries, how would you respond to this statement? Would you agree with it?

om class and your textbooks, please respond to the following essay question. Your answer must include at least four quotes from primary documents of your choosing from Reilly. Please make sure that you write the author of the primary source along with the page number next to your quotes: ex (L’Ouverture, 32).

Your essay must include an introduction, thesis (argument), body paragraphs that support your thesis by drawing on the primary source/s from Reilly for proof, and a conclusion. Please make sure that you are working with PRIMARY (NOT secondary sources). You will not receive credit for the use of secondary sources.

Imagine you have to opportunity to respond to the following statement about European imperialism:

The positive results of European imperialism in the 16th -19th centuries— such as scientific thinking, enlightenment thought, notions of universal human rights, global interconnectedness, advances in technology—far outweigh the negative aspects of European expansion—such as slavery, indigenous holocaust, environmental devastation, labor subjugation, colonialism.

Given what you now know, what you have read, and what we have discussed about the history of European imperialism in the 16th-19th centuries, how would you respond to this statement? Would you agree with it? If so, why? Would you disagree with it? If so, why? Would you fall somewhere in the middle? If so, why?

Comments from Support Team: Worlds of History:

Drawing on Michel Foucault’s notion of human capital and homo œconomicus, Wendy Brown argues that neoliberal political rationality results in depoliticisation. Assess this claim.

Drawing on Michel Foucault’s notion of human capital and homo œconomicus, Wendy Brown argues that neoliberal political rationality results in depoliticisation. Assess this claim.

PLEASE USE THE UPLOADED ARTICLES, THERE ARE 3 ARTICLES TO USED IN THIS ESSAY

please follow as essay formant, and please go through the PPTS first, and aware of all the theories and policies then please read the two articles deeply and analysis the points in the articles, using the points from the article and apply the theories from ppt, to draw this essay, fail to do so i will report to dispute department

check list provided from professor
1. reference use must be academic,intext reference must including page number.
2. Page numbers, spellcheck, proof-read!
3. Bibliography of approx 15 resources, and alphabetize it!

4. Do you have a clear, concise contention stated in your intro and does each argument in the body of your essay refer to / support that contention? Great! Do you have a conclusion which does not introduce new arguments but just niiiiicely sums up and ties up your argument? Beautiful!

5. Are concepts/claims/examples supported adequately with correct references?

6. Word limit is 2,000 words (+/- 10%)

7. If a sentence goes for half a page it is too long, break it up with some appropriate punctuation. If a paragraph goes for over a page it is too long, break it up with some appropriate parapraph breaks.

Comments from Support Team: 1. reference use must be academic,intext reference must including page number.
2. Page numbers, spellcheck, proof-read!
3. Bibliography of approx 15 resources, and alphabetize it!

4. Do you have a clear, concise contention stated in your intro and does each argument in the body of your essay refer to / support that contention? Great! Do you have a conclusion which does not introduce new arguments but just niiiiicely sums up and ties up your argument? Beautiful!

5. Are concepts/claims/examples supported adequately with correct references?

6. Word limit is 2,000 words (+/- 10%)

7. If a sentence goes for half a page it is too long, break it up with some appropriate punctuation. If a paragraph goes for over a page it is too long, break it up with some appropriate parapraph breaks.
Format: Other:Harvard referencing style

How did the conflict/problem get resolved?

roject 3: Interview paper (worth 10%)
Human Relations in the Workforce SOC 231

You will conduct 2 interviews that relate to conflicts, problems, or tense power dynamics at work. One will be with an upper-level executive (boss, CEO, owner…) and the other with a lower-level employee.

Both interviews will be structured and will follow the guideline below. Make sure you interview the people alone. Try to make them in-person interviews. When typing up your paper, do not reiterate the interview word-for-word, summarize what the person said for each paragraph.

First Paragraph: Background
What kind of company were you working at when these problems/conflicts occurred?
What was your position and duties at work?
How long had you worked at the company when the problems/conflict began to develop?
How were you feeling about that job before this tension developed?

Second Paragraph: The conflict/problem
Explain, in detail, how the conflict/problems developed and what happened?
Who was involved?
How bad did it get?
How long did it go on?

Third paragraph: Resolution
Did you get anyone else involved to help with the problem?
If so, what was that person’s response to the problem?

How did the conflict/problem get resolved?
How did you feel about the way it got resolved?

Fourth Paragraph: Effects
How disruptive was the conflict in your life?
Did it interfere with your performance on the job?
Did it interfere with your personal life (spill-over)?

Fifth Paragraph: Analysis of personal accountability
Were you experiencing some other outside pressures or stressors at the time of the conflict that had nothing to do with that person that led you to react to the situation in the way that you did?
Thinking back on the situation, do you think there was anything you could have done differently?
How did you feel about the way you handled the problem?
What would you differently if you had to face a similar problem again?

Sixth paragraph: Your analysis and reflection of experience
This paragraph is based on your own analysis of the situation knowing the person (or people) involved.

Is there more to the story than given by the subject?
What alternative explanations can you give for both the development and resolution of the conflict?
If you were involved in a similar conflict, how would you have handled it differently?
What did you learn from the experience?

Seventh Paragraph: Relating back to the OCR and lecture notes
What style of leadership was performed?
What types of power were used?
What kind of conflict was it?
What intra-group dynamics occurred?
What communication strategies were used and what could have been used to improve the situation?
What other information (concepts/theories) could relate to this situation?

If you need access to my online book please let me know and I will give you my username and password.

HR Practices and their Success Strategic Role of HR Consistency between Strategy and HR Practices Unique HR Aspects Why we would “love” (or not) to work

the writer has to read this article and the follow these instructions The written case study analysis must be at least 3 pages typed, double spaced, 12-point font, and 1-inch margins. Case studies should follow the following format: Company Introduction Industry and products – Current Status Revenue, Number of employees History – Positives and SetbacksB usiness Strategy – Mission The number one “thing” you should know about this company? HR Practices and their Success Strategic Role of HR Consistency between Strategy and HR Practices Unique HR Aspects Why we would “love” (or not) to work